PER CURIAM:
The Board found that respondent had violated § 8(a)(1) of the Act through coercive interrogation, threats of reprisal and offers of benefits; § 8(a)(2) through support of an employee's committee; 8(a)(3) by reason of discriminatory discharges and transfers; and § 8(a)(5) by refusing to bargain. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 158(a)(1), (2), (3), and (5). The order of the Board is amply supported in fact and in law. It follows that it will be enforced.