Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SCARBROUGH v. PORTRESS.

PER CURIAM.

A judgment of the superior court affirming an order of the State Board of Workmen's Compensation dismissing a plea in abatement filed before the board is not a final judgment and is not subject to appeal to this court by a bill of exceptions. Code Ann. § 6-701 and annotations, catchword "Abatement." This is true even though the judgment affirmed a ruling dismissing the plea on the ground that the board did not have jurisdiction. Neither the dismissal by the board nor the affirmance of the dismissal by the court was a final disposition of the cause nor would it have been if the ruling had been rendered as claimed by the plaintiff in error.

The exceptions to the judgment of the superior court being predicated on a matter which is not appealable to this court, the bill of exceptions is

Dismissed. Bell, P. J., Frankum and Hall, JJ., concur.

ARGUED MARCH 3, 1965 — DECIDED JUNE 18, 1965.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCARBROUGH v. PORTRESS
(Jun 18, 1965)