Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

PHYLLIS BRADFORD et al., Appellants, v. ROSALIND EDEN et al., Respondents

Per Curiam.

Order reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied. A plaintiff does not lose his right to an order of attachment pursuant to CPLR 6201 where he has joined an action in which he is entitled to an attachment with one or more causes of action in which he might not be entitled to such relief. ( M. S. Mercury Air Conditioning Corp. v. Rodolitz, N.Y.L.J., Jan. 29, 1964, p. 17, col. 5 [WIDLITZ, J.], affd. 22 A.D.2d 763.)

Concur — TILZER, J.P., HECHT and HOFSTADTER, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRADFORD v. ROSALIND EDEN
(Jul 8, 1965)