AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

JACQUE PELLOAT, JR., ET AL. v. THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS EXPRESSWAY COMMISSION ET AL.

Writ not considered. Since the Court of Appeal, after granting a writ of certiorari, disposed of the questions presented following a hearing on a rule nisi, its judgment thereon was a final adjudication. In view of this, applicants' exclusive remedy for review by this Court was by certiorari under Section 11 of Art. VII of the Constitution. (See also Art. 2167 C.C.P.) However, we cannot consider an application under the Constitutional provision unless the aggrieved party has heretofore applied for a rehearing in the Court of Appeal and such application has been denied by that Court. These procedural prerequisites have not been taken in this matter. The provisions of Rule IX, Section 4 of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, cited by applicants are not applicable to the situation presented here.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PELLOAT v. GREATER NEW ORLEANS EXPRESSWAY COMMISSION
(Jul 2, 1965)