AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOSEF V. LOMBARDO et al., Respondents, v. HAROLD W. STOKE et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for a libel, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 12, 1965, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; motion granted; and complaint dismissed, without costs. Based upon the facts alleged in the pleadings and affidavits, we are of the opinion that the defendants are protected by an absolute privilege in the issuance of the statement of October 6, 1960 here involved ( Sheridan v. Crisona, 14 N.Y.2d 108; Smith v. Helbraun, 21 A.D.2d 830). (For related appeals, see Matter of Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y., 26 Misc.2d 989, mod. 16 A.D.2d 443, mod. 14 N.Y.2d 138. ) Ughetta, Acting P.J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LOMBARDO v. STOKE
(Jul 6, 1965)