Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SULLIVAN, LONG AND HAGERTY ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. CHARLES B. ROBERTSON ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 1, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SULLIVAN, LONG AND HAGERTY v. ROBERTSON
(Jul 21, 1965)