Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PAZOL v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF SANDY SPRINGS.

FELTON, Chief Judge.

It appearing from the additional record, certified and sent to this court on the motion of the defendant in error, that the defendant's motion to set aside the judgment which is excepted to in this case (the granting of the summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff) was still pending in the trial court at the time the purported bill of exceptions was certified, although said motion was subsequently denied, there was no exception to a final judgment; therefore the writ of error was premature and must be dismissed. Code Ann. § 6-701; State Bank of Leesburg v. Hatcher, 106 Ga. App. 735 ( 128 S.E.2d 339); Fulton v. Chattanooga Pub. Co., 98 Ga. App. 473 ( 105 S.E.2d 922); Todd v. Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corp., 98 Ga. App. 673 106 S.E.2d 347); Wood v. Sheppard, 99 Ga. App. 537 ( 109 S.E.2d 69).

In addition to the fact that the motion to set aside the summary judgment was pending at the time of the exception to the summary judgment itself, the court in its nisi on the motion to vacate the summary judgment stayed all proceedings to enforce the summary judgment. It is apparent that an additional ruling was required by the court to make a final determination of the case.

Writ of error dismissed. Jordan and Deen, JJ., concur.

ARGUED JUNE 7, 1965 — DECIDED JULY 15, 1965 — REHEARING DENIED JULY 30, 1965.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PAZOL v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF SANDY SPRINGS
(Jul 15, 1965)