Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Marie MORRIS v. Starling Jackson MORRIS, Sr.

GOODWYN, Justice.

There being no assignments of error "bound with the transcript," as required by Rule 1 of the Revised Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 261 Ala. XIX, XX (Code 1940, Tit. 7, 1955 Cum.Pocket Part, p. 220; Recompiled Code 1958 (unofficial), Tit. 7, Appendix, p. 1154), we have no alternative but to affirm the decree appealed from. See: Trussell v. Ripps, 277 Ala. 248, 168 So.2d 619; Erwin v. Erwin, 269 Ala. 632, 114 So.2d 918; Patterson v. Gains, 264 Ala. 183, 85 So.2d 892; Dobson v. Deason, 258 Ala. 219, 61 So.2d 764, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MORRIS v. MORRIS
(Jul 15, 1965)