Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

C.E. AND BETTY GOSWICK, APPELLANTS, v. SAMUEL MITTELMAN AND ROSE MITTELMAN, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant urges the insufficiency of the proof upon the entry of a summary final decree of foreclosure. An examination of the record reveals that the appellant, as defendant, filed no answer other than a general denial and offered no affidavit or other type of proof at the hearing on the motion. The plaintiff, appellee, offered sworn testimony sufficient to establish a prima facie case. Under these circumstances, the chancellor properly entered the summary decree appealed. See Hardcastle v. Mobley, Fla.App. 1962, 143 So.2d 715; Kelly v. Patek, Fla.App. 1965, 172 So.2d 520.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOSWICK v. MITTELMAN
(Aug 11, 1965)