Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

OSGOOD-LEWIS-PERKINS, INC., A CORPORATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. ALMA M. GREEN ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

SMITH, J.

Upon reconsideration of that part of the judgment in which the district court quieted title in plaintiff to tracts ABCDA and EFGHE, we now conclude that title should be quieted in plaintiff subject to the interest of the United States or its privies and that the part of the district court judgment quieting title should be affirmed as so modified. Since no one else is affected and the United States is not a party to this suit, an inquiry on remand into the boundaries of the Indian land, including accretions, for this single purpose would not be worth while. We accordingly modify our opinion filed in this case June 11, 1965 ( 178 Neb. 807, 135 N.W.2d 718), but we adhere to it in all other respects.

Defendants have submitted a motion for rehearing which is directed to other issues. It is overruled.

ORIGINAL OPINION MODIFIED. MOTION FOR REHEARING OVERRULED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OSGOOD-LEWIS-PERKINS, INC. v. GREEN
(Oct 1, 1965)