Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROBERT L. SHARPSTEEN, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, LESLIE SHARPSTEEN, AND LESLIE SHARPSTEEN, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS, v. KARL L. KEESLER AND RANDOLPH W. KEESLER, A MINOR, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves a negligence action, wherein the appellants-plaintiffs brought an action against the appellees as defendants, as a result of an intersection collision, wherein the appellant, Robert L. Sharpsteen, was a passenger on a motor scooter driven by a third person, not a party to this proceeding. A jury verdict was returned in favor of the defendants.

The only point preserved for review by the appellants is the propriety of certain instructions given by the trial court. No objections to these instructions were made in accordance with Rule 2.6, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 F.S.A. and, therefore, it appears that the final judgment rendered on the jury verdict should be affirmed on the authority of Joe Reinertson, Inc. v. Nelson, Fla.App. 1964, 160 So.2d 723; Karl v. David Ritter Sportservice, Inc., Fla.App. 1964, 164 So.2d 23; Henningsen v. Smith, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 85.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHARPSTEEN v. KEESLER
(Oct 12, 1965)