Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANCIS BIRMINGHAM, Appellant.

Judgment modified and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, so as to provide for the imposition of a sentence to run concurrently instead of consecutively and, as so modified, affirmed. (Penal Law, § 1938.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and BERGAN. Judges DYE and SCILEPPI dissent and vote to affirm. (See People ex rel. Maurer v. Jackson, 2 N.Y.2d 259; People v. Erickson, 302 N.Y. 461; cf. People v. Di Lapo, 14 N.Y.2d 170. ) The consecutive sentence was permissible under section 1938 of the Penal Law.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BIRMINGHAM
(Oct 28, 1965)