Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WRIGLEY et al. v. NOTTINGHAM.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of this court in Wrigley v. Nottingham, 111 Ga. App. 404 ( 141 S.E.2d 859), having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia in Nottingham v. Wrigley, 221 Ga. 386 ( 144 S.E.2d 749), the judgment of this court is vacated. The judgment of this court must be conformed to that of the Supreme Court. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is

Affirmed. Bell, P. J., Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 9, 1965.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WRIGLEY v. NOTTINGHAM
(Nov 9, 1965)