AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

COMMODITY SERVICE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAMBURG-AMERICAN LINE, Defendant-Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-appellant, Commodity Service Corporation, as assignee of five German importers to whom it sold perishable pork products known as "fatbacks," sued the appellee, Hamburg-American Line, owner of the S.S. Grunewald, for damages sustained to five lots of "fatbacks" on an ocean voyage from New York to Bremen, Germany, in June 1952.

The shipper, since it has superior access to information as to the condition of goods when delivered to the carrier, has the burden of proving good condition at the time of delivery. See Hecht, Levis Kahn, Inc. v. The S.S. President Buchanan, 236 F.2d 627, 631 (2d Cir. 1956); The Niel Maersk, 91 F.2d 932, 934-935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 302 U.S. 753, 58 S.Ct. 281, 82 L.Ed. 582 (1937). The district judge found that appellant failed to sustain that burden. Neither the certification of the "fatbacks" by the Department of Agriculture nor the recitation in appellee's bill of lading establishes the good order of the cargo, since both refer only to the external condition of the cargo and do not reveal the possibility of inherent defects. See Hecht, Levis Kahn, Inc. v. The S.S. President Buchanan, 236 F.2d 627, 631 (2d Cir. 1956).

On this record, we cannot say that the trial court's findings were clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COMMODITY SERV. CORP. v. HAMBURG-AMERICAN LINE
(Dec 29, 1965)