1. SEARCHES AND SEIZURES. — Search Warrant — Affidavit — Evidence — Appeal and Error. Where search warrant was obtained upon affidavit based on testimony of policeman whose only source of information was telephone call to police department by person who refused to give his name, held, such affidavit does not meet constitutionally required standard and hence trial court erred in admitting into evidence the fruits of the search.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE PRINGLE delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a search and seizure case. The Attorney General confesses that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the fruits of the search and points out that the search warrant in issue here is constitutionally invalid under the express language of Hernandez v. People, 153 Colo. 316, 385 P.2d 996, and Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 Sup. Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723. We agree. The search warrant was obtained upon an affidavit based on testimony of a policeman whose only source of information was a telephone call to the police department by a person who refused to give his name. Such an affidavit does not meet the constitutional requirement set forth in Hernandez and Aguilar, supra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE PRINGLE delivered the opinion of the Court.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views herein expressed.