EPTON v. HOGAN

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 194, Docket 29941.

Attorney(S)

Len Holt, Washington, D.C. (J.A. Jordan, Jr., Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for
Joel Lewittes,
of State of New York (Louis J. Lefkowitz,
of State of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First
, Mortimer Sattler,
, Iris A. Steel, Deputy
, of counsel), for

Judges

Sterry Robinson Waterman
Irving Robert Kaufman
Paul Raymond Hays

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 194, Docket 29941.

Attorney(S)

Len Holt, Washington, D.C. (J.A. Jordan, Jr., Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for
Joel Lewittes,
of State of New York (Louis J. Lefkowitz,
of State of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First
, Mortimer Sattler,
, Iris A. Steel, Deputy
, of counsel), for

Judges

Sterry Robinson Waterman
Irving Robert Kaufman
Paul Raymond Hays

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

William EPTON et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Frank HOGAN et al., Respondents-Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants' complaint, concerning the alleged unconstitutionality of New York Penal Law § 161 and other statutes, was dismissed with leave to amend. An order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is not a final order and therefore not appealable. See Oppenheimer v. F.J. Young Co., Inc., 144 F.2d 387 (2d Cir. 1944); American Broadcasting Co. v. Wahl Co., 121 F.2d 412 (2d Cir. 1941); 6 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 54.12[1] at 116 (1953).

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

William EPTON et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Frank HOGAN et al., Respondents-Appellees.

Comments