AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

DOROTHEA K. MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. JOSEPH SCHUSHEIM et al., Defendants, and MARK MATTHEWS, Respondent.

In a consolidated action to recover (1) damages allegedly resulting from defendants' fraud and conspiracy to conceal from plaintiff the assets of defendant Mark Matthews, and (2) an alleged indebtedness, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 3, 1965 as approved certain rulings of the Referee supervising the pretrial examination of said defendant. Appeal dismissed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The order, insofar as appealed from, is nonappealable ( Hall v. Wood, 5 A.D.2d 998; Lee v. Chemway Corp., 20 A.D.2d 266; Oppenheimer v. Duophoto Corp., 271 App. Div. 1005). We have, however, examined the merits and have concluded that we would affirm the order (insofar as appealed from) if the appeal were not being dismissed. In our opinion, this matter must proceed to trial and further delay in this respect can no longer be tolerated. (For previous appeals see Matter of Matthews v. Matthews, 11 A.D.2d 813; Matter of Matthews v. Matthews, 14 A.D.2d 546; Matthews v. Schusheim, 36 Misc.2d 918, revd. 18 A.D.2d 719, rearg. den. 18 A.D.2d 834, app. dsmd. 13 N.Y.2d 756; Matthews v. Schusheim, 20 A.D.2d 671; Matthews v. Schusheim, 23 A.D.2d 632; Matthews v. Schusheim, 24 A.D.2d 705.) Ughetta, Acting P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTHEWS v. SCHUSHEIM
(Jan 31, 1966)