AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

TAVE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BENJAMIN WIESENFELD AND BESS WIESENFELD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FRANKLYN B. SPIEZLE AND WINDSOR CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in Judge Leonard's opinion in the Chancery Division, reported at 82 N.J. Super. 562.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TAVE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. WIESENFELD
(Feb 17, 1966)