AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of EDMUND J. MURPHY, Respondent, v. COLONIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS and LOAN ASSOCIATION et al., Appellants. In the Matter of WILLIAM A. COLLETTI, Respondent,

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: In accordance with the principles laid down in our opinion in Matter of Ochs v. Washington Hgts. Fed. Sav. Loan Assn. ( 17 N.Y.2d 82), decided herewith, petitioners in this case are entitled to inspection of the association's membership list so that they may effectively participate, by their right to vote, in the management of said association. Since no issue of fact is raised herein as to the "good faith" of petitioners, they must be allowed the exercise of this common-law right, limited, as in Matter of Ochs, to solely the names and addresses of their fellow members. The order of the Appellate Division should thus be affirmed.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MURPHY v. COLONIAL FEDERAL SAV. LOAN
(Feb 24, 1966)