Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TILLMAN CHEVROLET COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. OTTIS JAMES MOORE AND BONITA P. MOORE, RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration of the record and briefs in this case in the light of the argument of counsel, we conclude that no such conflict has been demonstrated as justifies the exercise of jurisdiction by this court.

The writ issued herein is discharged.

THORNAL, C.J., and ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

O'CONNELL, J., dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TILLMAN CHEVROLET COMPANY v. MOORE
(Mar 16, 1966)