AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of CHARLES FENSTER, Appellant, v. CRIMINAL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs. Denial of prohibition was within the discretion of the court below. We reach no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF FENSTER v. CRIMINAL COURT OF CITY OF N.Y
(Mar 24, 1966)