Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HYMAN BLUMENSTOCK et al., Appellants, v. NAOMI WEISSMAN et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants

Per Curiam.

In our opinion the holding of the County Court that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion to vacate its prior determination would be equally applicable to the Justice's Court had an application for similar relief been directed to that court in the first instance. (See Duran v. Chelsea Exch. Bank, 123 Misc. 158.)

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

MARGETT, BRENNER and OLLIFFE, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BLUMENSTOCK v. WEISSMAN
(Mar 30, 1966)