Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED FINANCE THRIFT CORP. et al., Petitioners, v. James BAIN, Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

The Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion reported in 393 S.W.2d at page 429 cited and quoted from Moore v. Savage, Tex.Civ.App., 359 S.W.2d 95 (writ ref., n. r. e. 1962), but did not take cognizance of the per curiam opinion of this Court reported in 362 S.W.2d at page 298. Similar to the situation in Moore v. Savage, here there was no objection to the definition of 'unreasonable collection efforts,' or to the special issue relating thereto, in the court's charge. See Rule 272, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED FINANCE THRIFT CORP. v. BAIN
(Mar 30, 1966)