Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGE I. THOMAS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THETOWNSHIP OF MORRIS, IN THE COUNTY OF MORRIS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division. 89 N.J. Super. 327 ( App. Div. 1965). We reserve, however, the question whether mere execution of the three-year contract of employment entered into on August 18, 1961 between Thomas and the Board of Education, even if it had been a valid one, would have given tenure to Thomas.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THOMAS v. BD. OF ED. OF MORRIS TP
(Apr 4, 1966)