AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KENNETH S. CASTERLIN et al., Appellants, v. JOSEPH X. MULLIN et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to declare void an amendment of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Newburgh, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, entered May 25, 1965, which granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition. Appeal dismissed, with costs. In this proceeding petitioners have appealed from a decision of Special Term, dated March 30, 1965. They have failed to appeal from the order thereon, entered May 25, 1965, which granted the motion. Hence, this court does not have jurisdiction to review Special Term's order. We nevertheless note that, were Special Term's order before us for review, we would affirm on the ground assigned by Special Term ( Matter of Neddo v. Schrade, 270 N.Y. 97; Matter of Paliotto v. Cohalan, 6 A.D.2d 886, affd. 8 N.Y.2d 1065; Matter of Iraci v. Harwood, 6 A.D.2d 815). Beldock, P.J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CASTERLIN v. MULLIN
(Jul 5, 1966)