Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARL I. COHEN, Appellant.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING.

Judge FULD dissents in the following memorandum in which Chief Judge DESMOND concurs:

I adhere to the views I expressed in People v. Dinan ( 11 N.Y.2d 350, 357) — that evidence should be excluded if obtained by interception of telephone communications in contravention of the Federal Communications Act, and, accordingly, vote to reverse the order appealed from.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. COHEN
(Jul 7, 1966)