Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

DEBINSKI v. DIRECTOR OF THE PATUXENT INSTITUTION

DEFECTIVE DELINQUENTS — Testimony Of Doctor, Formal Report From Patuxent And Record Of Applicant's Convictions Were More Than Sufficient To Support Verdict Of Defective Delinquency.

S.K.S.

Decided July 26, 1966.

PER CURIAM.

On 19, April, 1965, the applicant, serving a ten year sentence for perverted practice, was found by a jury to be a defective delinquent and committed to Patuxent.

In this application he attacks the constitutionality of Code (1957), Art. 31B (1965 Cum. Supp.). His contentions in this regard are thoroughly disposed of by our decision in Director v. Daniels, 243 Md. 16.

Applicant also contends that there was insufficient evidence to support a verdict of defective delinquency. The testimony of Dr. Boslow, the formal report from Patuxent, and the record of convictions are more than sufficient to support the verdict. Brunson v. Director, 239 Md. 128, 210 A.2d 372 (1965).

Application denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DEBINSKI v. DIRECTOR
(Jul 26, 1966)