Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. R. H. LYNCH, Jr.

GOODWYN, Justice.

This is a suit under the Federal Employers' Liability Act. The appeal is brought by the defendant from a judgment rendered on a jury's verdict awarding damages to the plaintiff.

All of the argued assignments of error relate to, and have a bearing upon, the amount of damages to be awarded the plaintiff. But the amount of the damages is not questioned here. Accordingly, the errors charged in those assignments, if there be error in them, are rendered harmless and cannot work a reversal. See: State v. Dunlap, et al., ante p. 418, 186 So.2d 132; Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. Hendrix, 215 Ala. 285, 288-289, 110 So. 312.

The judgment appealed from is due to be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, MERRILL and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.

COLEMAN, J., dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE R.R. CO. v. LYNCH
(Jul 14, 1966)