Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of AMELIA CASSESE, Respondent, v. HERMAN KATZ, as City Clerk of the City of New York, Appellant. In the Matter of MARIA E. MONPLAISIR et al., Respondents,

In the first above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: It is conceded that General Order No. 14 of the Police Commissioner is valid, and was promulgated under authority conferred on the Police Commissioner by the Charter as well as the Administrative Code of the City of New York. Each proposed local law would limit the broad powers of processing disciplinary matters conferred upon the Commissioner by the Charter and implemented by the Administrative Code. This would, therefore, affect the plenary power of discipline granted by section 434 of the New York City Charter. We need decide no other question.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges VAN VOORHIS, SCILEPPI, KEATING and HUGHES. Judges HILLfn_ and GORMANfn_ dissent and vote to reverse upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Designated pursuant to section 2 of article VI of the State Constitution in the temporary absence of Judges FULD, BURKE and BERGAN.

In the second above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs, upon the authority of Matter of Cassese v. Katz, decided herewith. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges VAN VOORHIS, SCILEPPI, KEATING and HUGHESfn_. Judges HILLfn_ and GORMANfn_ dissent and vote to reverse upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CASSESE v. KATZ
(Sep 2, 1966)