Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Robert E. Connolley, New York City, for appellant. Samuel A. Berger, New York City (Rein, Mound Cotton, and Irving Smith, Jr., New York City, on the brief), for Waldo Hutchins, Jr., appellee. Arthur E. Sullivan, Lark Sullivan, New York City, on the brief for Chemical Bank New York Trust Co., and William J. Fagan, as Executors of and Trustees Under Last Will of Elizabeth Wolcott Hamilton Jaeger, deceased. Lyman B. Lewis, Geneva, N.Y., on the brief for Lyman B. Lewis, as Executor of and as Trustee under Last Will and Testament of Margaret J. Hutchins, deceased, pro se, and for Elizabeth Boswell as Executor of and as Trustee under Last Will and Testament of Margaret J. Hutchins, deceased.
Judges
  • Joseph Edward Lumbard
  • Sterry Robinson Waterman
  • Robert Palmer Anderson
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Robert E. Connolley, New York City, for appellant. Samuel A. Berger, New York City (Rein, Mound Cotton, and Irving Smith, Jr., New York City, on the brief), for Waldo Hutchins, Jr., appellee. Arthur E. Sullivan, Lark Sullivan, New York City, on the brief for Chemical Bank New York Trust Co., and William J. Fagan, as Executors of and Trustees Under Last Will of Elizabeth Wolcott Hamilton Jaeger, deceased. Lyman B. Lewis, Geneva, N.Y., on the brief for Lyman B. Lewis, as Executor of and as Trustee under Last Will and Testament of Margaret J. Hutchins, deceased, pro se, and for Elizabeth Boswell as Executor of and as Trustee under Last Will and Testament of Margaret J. Hutchins, deceased.
Judges
  • Joseph Edward Lumbard
  • Sterry Robinson Waterman
  • Robert Palmer Anderson
See more information ...
Smart Summary

Da v. d WOLCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

PER CURIAM:

We affirm in open court the order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York which granted summary judgment to the defendants, dismissing the complaint, on the grounds of res judicata and collateral estoppel arising from the determination by the New York courts of the validity of the release executed by plaintiff, for the reasons set forth in Judge Bonsal's opinion, reported at 245 F. Supp. 578.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

WOLCOTT v. HUTCHINS
(Sep 20, 1966)