AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SEWELL, by Next Friend.

JORDAN, Judge.

Under the decision of this court in Georgia Life c. Ins. Co. v. Sewell, 113 Ga. App. 443 (1) ( 148 S.E.2d 447), which involved the same plaintiff and the same accident and a similar policy provision, the excerpt from the charge complained of was not erroneous for any reasons enumerated, and since the evidence, differing only slightly from that in the above stated case, did not demand a verdict for the defendant the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for directed verdict and the subsequent motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed. Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 6, 1966 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 16, 1966 — REHEARING DENIED SEPTEMBER 23, 1966 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILES INSURANCE v. SEWELL
(Sep 16, 1966)