Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HOME MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CALLAWAY.

HALL, Judge.

The error enumerated in this appeal is the overruling of the defendant's motion for judgment non obstante veredicto as to the award of penalties and attorney's fees. The insured's proof of loss under the homeowner's insurance policy claimed a loss of $3,214.47, and suit was brought to recover that amount. The verdict returned for the insured's loss was for $2,300. "Where the verdict in a suit on an insurance policy is for substantially less than the amount claimed in the proof of loss and less than the amount demanded in the petition, no recovery for damages and attorney's fees is authorized." Ga. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Boney, 113 Ga. App. 459 ( 148 S.E.2d 457).

The trial court erred in overruling the defendant's motion for judgment non obstante veredicto as to the award of penalties and attorney's fees.

Judgment reversed. Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 12, 1966 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1966.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOME MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CALLAWAY
(Sep 21, 1966)