Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM H. LESTER, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before this Court upon a petition for writ of certiorari and a notice of interlocutory appeal both directed to a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, filed January 26, 1966 ( 183 So.2d 589). The Court has this day entered its order denying the petition for certiorari and, in connection with the consideration of the jurisdictional power of this Court to entertain said writ of certiorari, it has re-examined the record in the interlocutory appeal and has sua sponte reconsidered its order of May 2d 1966 denying the motion of appellee City of St. Petersburg to dismiss the appeal and, upon such reconsideration, finds that this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the interlocutory appeal herein under Section 4(2), Article V of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Thereupon, it is

Ordered that said appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, DREW, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, J., concurring specially.

ROBERTS, Justice (concurring specially):

In my opinion the cause is reviewable by conflict certiorari. I agree this Court is without jurisdiction to review by appeal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LESTER v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG
(Oct 14, 1966)