MEMORANDUM. The evidence taken from the defendant at the place of his arrest was properly received in evidence (see People v. Peters, 18 N.Y.2d 238; People v. Rivera, 14 N.Y.2d 441; People v. Santiago, 13 N.Y.2d 326, 334). The prearraignment statements made by the defendant were properly received in evidence ( People v. Meyer, 11 N.Y.2d 162; cf. People v. Huntley, 15 N.Y.2d 72, 77). Miranda v. Arizona ( 384 U.S. 436) is not applicable ( People v. McQueen, 18 N.Y.2d 337, decided herewith).
Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING concur in Memorandum; Chief Judge DESMOND and Judge FULD dissent and vote to reverse upon the dissenting opinion in People v. McQueen ( 18 N.Y.2d 337, decided herewith) and reach no other question.
Upon reargument: Judgment affirmed in a Memorandum.