Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BARNABEL PENA, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM. The evidence obtained pursuant to the search warrant was properly received into evidence; there was no need to disclose the informer's identity ( People v. Valentine, 17 N.Y.2d 128; People v. White, 16 N.Y.2d 270; People v. Malinsky, 15 N.Y.2d 86). The statements made at the scene were properly admitted into evidence ( People v. Huntley, 15 N.Y.2d 72, 77). Miranda v. Arizona ( 384 U.S. 436) is not applicable to the present case ( People v. McQueen, 18 N.Y.2d 337, decided herewith).

Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING concur in Memorandum; Chief Judge DESMOND and Judge FULD dissent and vote to reverse upon the dissenting opinion in People v. McQueen ( 18 N.Y.2d 337, decided herewith) and reach no other question.

Upon reargument: Judgment affirmed in a Memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PENA
(Oct 27, 1966)