Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HOLLOWAY et al. v. POPPELL.

FELTON, Chief Judge.

A valid filing of a transcript of evidence prepared from recollection requires the agreement of the parties or their counsel thereon, or, in case of the inability of the parties to agree as to the correctness of such transcript, either the decision of the trial judge thereon or, if he is unable to recall what "transpired," an order so stating. Code Ann. § 6-805 (g) (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 24). The transcript of evidence prepared from recollection and filed in the trial court by appellants meets none of the above requirements, being signed only by counsel for appellants. A determination of the question presented in this appeal from the judgment on the direction of the verdict involves necessarily a consideration of the evidence; and where the evidence is not properly brought up all questions requiring a consideration of evidence will be resolved in favor of the judgment, and it will be affirmed. Giles v. Peachtree Pantries, 209 Ga. 536 ( 74 S.E.2d 545) and cit.; Clark v. State, 219 Ga. 680, 683 (2) ( 135 S.E.2d 270) and cit.; State Hwy. Dept. v. Attaway, 97 Ga. App. 140 (1) ( 102 S.E.2d 514) and cit. Therefore, since no approved transcript is in this record we are required to affirm the judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee.

Judgment affirmed. Frankum and Pannell, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 9, 1966 — DECIDED OCTOBER 28, 1966.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOLLOWAY v. POPPELL
(Oct 28, 1966)