SCHOCK v. BD. OF REV., DIV. EMPL. SEC, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. George Duggan argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant. Mr. Edward A. Kaplan argued the cause for defendant-respondent Board of Review, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor and Industry, State of New Jersey ( Mr. Kaplan of counsel). Mr. Luke A. Kiernan, Jr. argued the cause for defendant-respondent Public Service Electric and Gas Company.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ROBERT C. SCHOCK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OFEMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY,AND PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC GAS COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny for the majority of the Appellate Division. 89 N.J. Super. 118 ( App. Div. 1965). See also: Sarja v. Iron Range Resources Rehabilitation, Minn., 144 N.W.2d 377 (1966).

The Chief Justice and Justices Jacobs and Proctor dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons expressed in the dissent of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Justices FRANCIS, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 4.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS and PROCTOR — 3.

SCHOCK v. BD. OF REV., DIV. EMPL. SEC

ROBERT C. SCHOCK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OFEMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY,AND PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC GAS COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Comments