Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

SAMUEL ATKIN et al., Appellants, v. HILL, DARLINGTON GRIMM et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the majority opinion at the Appellate Division; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Judge KEATING concurs in the result upon the ground that the stock had been "offered to the public in this state" more than one year before the first sale to plaintiffs. This is evidenced by three actual sales in 1957 and, even more clearly, by quotations of the stock in the "pink sheets" of over-the-counter quotations available to broker-dealers.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ATKIN v. HILL, DARLINGTON GRIMM
(Dec 30, 1966)