Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of EDWARD E. MURPHY et al., Appellants, v. MAX ZIEGLER et al., Constituting the Planning Board of the Town of Yorktown, Respondents, and NEMEROFF YORKTOWN CORPORATION, Inter

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the ground that the issue has become moot. (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [1952], § 98; Matter of Buffalo Cr. R.R. Co. v. City of Buffalo, 301 N.Y. 595.) Although we granted leave to appeal, the necessity of this dismissal precludes us from reaching the merits of the case. After leave to appeal had been granted by the court, the Yorktown Town Board rezoned the subject premises. Consequently, the issue as to the planning board's compliance with the former zoning ordinance (no longer applicable to the parcel in question) has been rendered academic.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MURPHY v. ZIEGLER
(Jan 12, 1967)