Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

MADELINE MURCH, WIDOW OF RALPH K. MURCH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LARKEYCOMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

This is a compensation case in which the Division of Workmen's Compensation allowed recovery for a heart-death allegedly arising out of and in the course of employment. Upon appeal, the County Court affirmed. The Appellate Division reversed on appeal on the ground that causality had not been established. This Court granted certification. 47 N.J. 240 (1966).

We have examined the record and agree with the conclusion of the Appellate Division.

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MURCH v. LARKEY CO
(Jan 23, 1967)