Per Curiam.
The right to file a second petition for rehearing after expiration of the time prescribed by Rule 5(a) of this court is questionable. See In the Matter of Davis, 15 Haw. 724; Waterhouse v. Capital Investment Co., 44 Haw. 311, 353 P.2d 1016. At all events the petition is without merit and is denied.
Cassidy and Wirtz, JJ., having dissented from the majority in the original opinion, do not join in the disposition of the petition on the merits.