GILDAY v. HAUCHWIT, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. A. Leo Bohl argued the cause for
Mr. John W. Hand argued the cause for respondent (
Evans, Hand, Evans, Allabough Amoresano, attorneys
Mr. Brian J. McGrievy on the brief).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. A. Leo Bohl argued the cause for
Mr. John W. Hand argued the cause for respondent (
Evans, Hand, Evans, Allabough Amoresano, attorneys
Mr. Brian J. McGrievy on the brief).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ELSIE GILDAY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LUCILLE L. HAUCHWIT, DEFENDANT, ANDALFRED G. HAUCHWIT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND PETER CARLO,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ETC., DEFENDANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment as to the defendant Carlo is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Gaulkin and the matter is remanded to the Passaic County Court with directions to enter judgment in favor of said defendant.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For affirmance — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

GILDAY v. HAUCHWIT

ELSIE GILDAY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LUCILLE L. HAUCHWIT, DEFENDANT, ANDALFRED G. HAUCHWIT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND PETER CARLO,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ETC., DEFENDANT.

Comments