Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

RUSSELL CHAMBERLAIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RONALD STURMA, DEFENDANT, ANDNOREEN WARD, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHAMBERLAIN v. STURMA
(Feb 20, 1967)