HAMLA CORP. v. COLEMAN

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

[No. 167, September Term, 1966.]

Attorney(S)

Hyman Ginsberg, with whom were George Psoras and Ginsberg Ginsberg on the brief, for appellant. Leonard J. Harmatz, with whom was David H. Cohen on the brief, for appellees.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

[No. 167, September Term, 1966.]

Attorney(S)

Hyman Ginsberg, with whom were George Psoras and Ginsberg Ginsberg on the brief, for appellant. Leonard J. Harmatz, with whom was David H. Cohen on the brief, for appellees.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

HAMLA CORPORATION OF MARYLAND, INC. v. COLEMAN, ET AL.

USURY — Sale Of Goods On Credit With Added Charge For Financing Services Not Within Usury Statute, Where Note And Mortgage Securing Obligation Are Assigned To Financing Institution — "Time Sale" Theory Of Rothman v. Silver Applied. p. 697

G.W.L.

Decided March 7, 1967.

Motion for reargument filed on April 3, 1967, denied on April 5, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from must be reversed under our holding in Rothman v. Silver, 245 Md. 292, 226 A.2d 308 (1967), and cases therein cited.

Decree reversed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

HAMLA CORPORATION OF MARYLAND, INC. v. COLEMAN, ET AL.

Comments