Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

ANTHONY CARONA v. DR. HOWARD M. RADWIN AND HIS INSURER, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.

The application is denied. The judgment complained of is correct.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted to resolve the legal question with a view of reconciling the decision with the views expressed in Smith v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co., 247 La. 695, 174 So.2d 122 and Sizeler v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., La.App., 102 So.2d 326. He expresses no opinion at this time as to how the question should be resolved.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion a writ should be granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARONA v. RADWIN
(May 4, 1967)