Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEPHEN DE PASQUALE, Appellant

Per Curiam.

Although the judgment of conviction is affirmed, the attention of the Bar is nevertheless called to the following: In this case the prosecutor, in summation, in answer to the statements in defense summation that the main prosecution witness was a liar, stated that his "Christian background precludes (him) from accusing another human being of being a liar", and on a few occasions he begged the Lord's forgiveness for having to use the word God in repeating testimony in which it was used. Reference to race, nationality or religion may be prejudicial even though not intended that way, and should be eschewed unless in connection with a matter in issue and unavoidable.

The judgment of conviction should be affirmed.

Concur — DI GIOVANNA, RITCHIE and SHAPIRO, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DE PASQUALE
(May 31, 1967)