Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WALTER BAKER, Appellant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

In each action: Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BREITEL. Chief Judge FULD and Judges BERGAN and KEATING dissent and vote to reverse on the ground that the imposition of consecutive sentences for the crimes of unlawful entry and petit larceny arising out of a single transaction violated section 1938 of the Penal Law.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BAKER
(Jun 1, 1967)