AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PETER WASYLEC, Respondent, v. SAUL STAMBLER et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. PRUDENTIAL OPERATING CO., INC., Appellant,

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 31, 1966, which denied appellants' motion to resettle the judgment theretofore entered, dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements to each group of respondents which filed a separate brief, payable by appellants jointly. The order is not appealable ( Katz v. Katz, 13 A.D.2d 529; Amsterdam v. Compania Naviera "Estrella De Plata", S.A. Panama, R.P., 8 A.D.2d 947, 948; Wiggins v. Town of Somers, 8 A.D.2d 733; McCormick v. Mars Assoc., 25 A.D.2d 433). In any event, we have examined the merits and, if we were not dismissing the appeal, we would have affirmed the order. Brennan, Acting P.J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WASYLEC v. STAMBLER
(Jun 12, 1967)