Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE v. Susan EPPERSON and N. H. Blanchard

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — STATE'S POWERS FUNCTIONS — STATUTE SPECIFYING CURRICULUM IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS AS VALID EXERCISE OF. — Initiated Measure No. 1 of 1928 [Ark. Stat. Ann. 80-1627 and 80-1628 (Repl. 1960)] held a valid exercise of the state's power to specify the curriculum in its public schools, although no opinion expressed as to the theory involved, the answer not being necessary to the decision, and the issue not having been raised.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the principal issue, that of constitutionality, the court holds that Initiated Measure No. 1 of 1928, Ark. Stat. Ann. 80-1627 and 80-1628 (Repl. 1960), is a valid exercise of the state's power to specify the curriculum in its public schools. The court expresses no opinion on the question whether the Act prohibits any explanation of the theory of evolution or merely prohibits teaching that the theory is true; the answer not being necessary to a decision in the case, and the issue not having been raised.

The decree is reversed and the cause dismissed.

WARD, J., concurs. Brown, J., dissents.

PAUL WARD, Justice, concurring. I agree with the first sentence in the majority opinion.

To my mind, the rest of the opinion beclouds the clear announcement made in the first sentence.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. EPPERSON
(Jul 26, 1967)