Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

POPE v. THE STATE.

BELL, Presiding Judge.

After the term of court at which the prisoner was convicted and sentenced for breaking and entering an automobile, he filed a motion denominated "Motion extraordinary to vacate and set aside the judgment, conviction, and sentence" and contending that his indictment and conviction were void. If the detention is unlawful because the indictment and conviction are void, the prisoner's remedy is by a writ of habeas corpus. See McDonald v. State, 126 Ga. 536 ( 55 S.E. 235); Riley v. State, 107 Ga. App. 639 (2, 3) ( 131 S.E.2d 124); Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545 ( 87 SC 643, 17 L.Ed.2d 599). A motion to set aside the verdict and judgment is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case. Gravitt v. State, 165 Ga. 779 ( 142 S.E. 100); Claughton v. State, 179 Ga. 157 ( 175 S.E. 470); Waits v. State, 204 Ga. 295 ( 49 S.E.2d 492).

The judgment of the superior court denying the motion is

Affirmed. Pannell and Whitman, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED JULY 10, 1967 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1967.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POPE v. STATE
(Sep 5, 1967)